God’s Holy Name
If one examines the Tetragrammation and the position of its four characters, you will note that the Divine name is written from right to left.
Therefore the four substituted consonants are also literally right to left as well. HWHY. A visual comparison shows this to be accurate. In respect and honor of the Bearer of the Name, I write God’s name as He has written it.
Personally, I suppose I wouldn’t like someone writing my name backward. Especially, after they had come to realize they had been doing so unaware.
Any recognition, interpretation, or discussion of the Divine Name must acknowledge the truth of how it literally appears in the Tetragrammaton.
For teachers, it’s important to teach from Chapter 1. Literally, from the beginning. We mentally have to reverse God’s name because of how our language is structured. But it’s important to realize and remember we do so. So its good to explain why HWHY is actual and then make the necessary linguistic reversal. When a person then looks at the Tetragrammaton, it will make sense.
I would like you to do something. It is simple and you do it all the time. It is something that if you become skilled at, you will increase your comprehensive ability. It is an application of pattern-recognition skills.
Pattern-recognition as you know is taught in early childhood development. Remember the blocks with various shapes/colors that had to be fit into the appropriately shaped slot? That is an example of the early teaching of pattern-recognition.
Use this same pattern-recognition while looking at the Tetragrammaton and fitting the four consonants in appropriate order. Two of the four characters of the Tetragrammaton are the same. Two of the four consonants are the same; the H’s. These must match! The two Tetragrammaton characters that match are positioned at the left with one being the leftmost character. The second H is positioned 2 characters to the right of the 1st. This determines the position of the other two letters. HWHY Again it is simple enough to look at the visual comparison shown at the beginning of this article.
Even though this forces you to rethink what you have thought, should or can this truth be denied? This is not my truth; it is simply true. Can you be a real truth bearer and at the same time ‘cherry-pick’ the truths you are willing to acknowledge? I cannot deny truth. I can only conform and then be led by it. And if you are going to teach about such things, should you be thorough and start from the beginning?
Within the brief discussion on this topic I dare say a young child could understand this. Believe what is right before your eyes. Or what will convince you? Will mere words form sufficient convincing argument when tangible proof is insufficient? How is this remaining ‘teachable’? No one is beyond instruction.
brotherjohnsite.org 
A good teacher begins at chapter one page one. They don’t hop to chapter 3.
Here’s a concept: Not everyone speaks English. Nor do all people have a Western culture egocentric view of the world.
This blog is read in 70 countries around the world.
News: The world is not English.
And English or not, when you look at the tetragrammaton, it is as the EYES perceive it. Right to left.
The article is self explanatory.
Circular reasoning isn’t REAL reasoning.
A comment about Jahsdisciple:
Nowhere in the Bible is any language referring to a “disciple of God.
“Christians” are disciples of Christ Jesus. Your screen name omits the Lord; just as you were taught by the Watchtower Society to do.
Since the group you are with feel that the name “Jehovah” is unclean, do they complain to you for using “Jah”?
Your real issue is about the fact that I’ve pointed out that demonstrating, as Pearl Doxsey calls your activity in her forum, is not proper Christian conduct.
When you look at the tetragrammaton with your eyes, you must first see them (the characters) as they are. Then substitute the english letters as they are.
Then, you turn them around to fit the order your language is read in. This is all explained in the article.
It may seem an unnecessary to do for someone who is used to taking shortcuts.
If you were really in union with Christ, you would follow him and not some human.
It’s clear you don’t get it and there is no further basis for discussion.
——————————————
The person calling themselves “jahsdisciple” wrote in reply to this, my last comment to this person on this topic.
When someone doesn’t have truth or logic on their side, they respond like this:
You call it “circular reasoning” because you are clueless about how hebrew is translated…and you cant see that. If you cant even explain the divine name,this only proves how clueless you are in other areas. EG. How are Anointed trampled in this time as CHRIST PREDICTED. If you cant even explain translating rules and get it right about the Divine Name,how can you see anything else? Jahs spirit cannot be upon you if you cant explain correctly about His own name. You say its backwards…its not. Educate yourself about hebrew translating into english and then post a reply
” Will mere words form sufficient convincing argument when tangible proof is insufficient? How is this remaining ‘teachable’? No one is beyond instruction.”
Everyone except you! Do your research before posting translating ignorance. Give us some “tangible proof” you understand translating rules!
Just so you can prove “Pearl” wrong,why don’t you explain how anointed are being “Trampled” today? Who are gentiles within the “Holy place” ? You wont touch the subject because you are an unfaithful anointed who has stopped listening to Christ..and cant even explain His Fathers name correctly.
—————————–
If you refer to the article entitled “Is Michael Jesus Christ New Name?:
https://brotherjohnsite.org/2015/05/01/is-michael-jesus-christs-new-name/
Pearl Doxsey needs no help proving what or what she isn’t.
What I am not a part of is that of an activist group relying on their own might, controlled by “handlers” with an agenda that has nothing to do with Christ Jesus.